Monk Spaces

Beyond the work

System Models Used in Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs)

What is a System Model in an LCA?

Real-world manufacturing is rarely simple. A single industrial process often creates multiple outputs at the same time—for example, a sawmill produces both timber and sawdust. When conducting a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), practitioners need a standardized rulebook to determine exactly how much of the factory’s environmental burden belongs to the timber and how much belongs to the sawdust.

A system model is this rulebook. It provides the methodological rules for allocating environmental impacts, linking markets, and determining how burdens are assigned between products, by-products, recycled materials, and market effects.

The Three Primary System Models

To handle interconnected global supply chains, system models are defined by international LCA standards (such as ISO 14040/14044) and implemented by major life cycle inventory databases (such as ecoinvent). The choice of model depends on the goal of the study:

Consequential (Substitution, consequential, long-term): While Cut-off and APOS measure historical averages, the Consequential model predicts the future. It is designed to show the macroeconomic consequences of a change in demand. Instead of using average, everyday data, it looks at “marginal” suppliers. These specific facilities will actually scale up or down if the market changes. It also uses a method called substitution (rather than allocation) to calculate how generating new by-products might displace other established products on the global market.

Cut-off (Allocation, cut-off by classification): This is the most widely used “attributional” model. In an attributional LCA, the assessment strictly accounts for the historical, physical supply chain and average environmental burdens directly tied to a product. It operates on a simple philosophy: a producer is fully responsible for creating their primary product and for treating any useless waste. However, if the process generates a recyclable by-product (like scrap metal), that material is “cut off” from the original environmental burden. The next company that purchases and uses that recycled scrap starts with a clean, burden-free slate.

APOS (Allocation at the point of substitution): Also an attributional model, APOS takes a different approach by focusing on shared responsibility. Instead of cutting off burdens, APOS dictates that if a process creates a useful by-product, the environmental costs of the factory should be proportionally distributed across all the valuable outputs. In this model, the environmental burden follows the material throughout its entire lifecycle.

Conclusion

Choosing the correct system model is one of the most critical decisions an LCA practitioner must make. Selecting a historical model when a consequential one was needed can significantly influence the results and their interpretation. By understanding the underlying assumptions of models like Cut-off, APOS, and Consequential, organizations can ensure their environmental reporting is both accurate and perfectly aligned with their specific goals.

Related projects

See how we apply this in practice.

Related insights


Continue learning.

Before you begin
Find out what you need to get started.

Scroll to Top